Federal Question Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction given to federal courts in cases involving the interpretation and application of the U.S. Constitution, acts of Congress, and treaties.
Federal question jurisdiction refers to the authority of the federal court to hear cases that involve federal laws, the U.S. Constitution, or treaties. This jurisdiction is established by Article III of the U.S. Constitution and is codified in 28 U.S. Code §1331.
To establish federal question jurisdiction, the plaintiff must be asserting a claim that arises under federal law. This means that the plaintiff’s claim must be based on federal law, and the outcome of the case must depend on the resolution of a federal law issue. The plaintiff must also satisfy the amount in controversy requirement, which requires that the damages or value of the property at issue exceed $75,000.
In addition to federal question jurisdiction, there are other types of jurisdiction that federal courts may have, including diversity jurisdiction and supplemental jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction allows a federal court to hear cases where the parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Supplemental jurisdiction allows a federal court to hear claims that are related to the original claim and that do not have an independent basis for federal jurisdiction.
Overall, federal question jurisdiction is an important aspect of the federal court system, allowing parties to bring claims that are based on federal law and ensuring that there is a consistent and uniform interpretation and application of federal law throughout the country.
More Answers:
Federalist 10: Madison’s Solution to Factionalism in the U.S. ConstitutionThe Federalist Papers: A seminal work on American political philosophy and its relevance in modern times
Understanding Federalism: Pros and Cons of a Dual Sovereignty Structure