A platelet determination was performed on an automated instrument and a very low value was obtained. The platelets appeared adequate when estimated from the stained blood film. The best explanation for this discrepancy is:
The discrepancy between the low platelet determination obtained from the automated instrument and the adequate platelet estimation from the stained blood film could be due to several reasons
The discrepancy between the low platelet determination obtained from the automated instrument and the adequate platelet estimation from the stained blood film could be due to several reasons. These could include:
1. Instrument malfunction: Automated instruments rely on specific algorithms and processes to determine platelet counts. If there was a malfunction in the instrument, such as a calibration error or technical issue, it may have resulted in an inaccurate low platelet count. This would not be reflected in the stained blood film estimation, which is manually observed and counted by a laboratory technician.
2. Platelet clumping: Sometimes, platelets may aggregate together or clump in the presence of an anticoagulant used during the automated platelet determination. This can lead to underestimation of the platelet count, as the clumps may be counted as a single entity. However, when the technician prepares the stained blood film, the clumps may disperse, allowing for a more accurate estimation of individual platelet cells.
3. Platelet satellitism: Satellitism is a phenomenon where platelets adhere to neutrophils due to the presence of an antibody in the blood sample. This can negatively affect the platelet count obtained by automated instruments as the instrument may mistakenly count the platelet-neutrophil complexes as single entities. However, when examining the stained blood film, the technician can identify this satellitism and exclude the platelet-neutrophil complexes from the platelet count, resulting in a more accurate estimation.
4. Platelet activation and degradation: Platelet activation and subsequent degradation may occur during the process of sample collection, handling, or analysis. This can lead to a decrease in the number of functional platelets, which may be reflected in the automated platelet count. However, the stained blood film estimation may not be as affected if the technician examines the film soon after sample collection, before significant platelet activation and degradation occur.
In conclusion, the best explanation for the discrepancy between the low platelet determination from the automated instrument and the adequate platelet estimation from the stained blood film could be instrument malfunction, platelet clumping, platelet satellitism, or platelet activation and degradation. It is important to further investigate the cause of this discrepancy and take necessary steps to ensure accurate platelet determination for proper diagnosis and treatment.
More Answers:
Understanding Acute Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP): Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment OptionsFactors Leading to Falsely Elevated Hemoglobin Determinations on an Electronic Cell Counter
Understanding the Mean Reticulocyte Count in Cord Blood of Healthy, Full-Term Newborns: Insights into Hematopoietic System Development