A Layer 2 switch is used to switch incoming frames from a 1000BASE-T port to a port connected to a 100Base-T network. Which method of memory buffering would work best for this task?
For the given task of switching incoming frames from a 1000BASE-T port to a port connected to a 100Base-T network, a Layer 2 switch would need to buffer the frames temporarily to handle any speed mismatch or congestion between the two networks.
In this scenario, the best method of memory buffering would be the shared memory buffer. Shared memory buffering involves using a single shared memory pool to buffer incoming frames. This method enables efficient sharing of memory resources among multiple ports and optimizes memory utilization.
With shared memory buffering, the Layer 2 switch can store a certain number of frames in the shared memory pool. The switch can then efficiently switch these frames to the appropriate outgoing port without any loss or delay.
Additionally, shared memory buffering supports variable frame sizes and allows for flexible allocation of memory based on the data transfer needs of different ports. It also provides fairness in resource allocation as all ports can access the shared memory pool without any dedicated memory for each port.
However, it is important to note that shared memory buffering may have limitations in terms of the maximum number of frames it can buffer or the total size of the shared memory pool. The switch needs to have an appropriate buffer size considering the potential burst of traffic or congestion that can occur between these networks.
Overall, shared memory buffering is the recommended method for buffering frames in a Layer 2 switch when switching frames between different speed networks, providing efficient memory utilization and flexibility.
More Answers:
Converting Hexadecimal to Decimal: Understanding the Process and Calculating the Decimal Equivalent of 3FConverting Binary to Hexadecimal: An Easy Guide with Examples
Understanding the Impact of Error Thresholds on Switching Methods: Cut-Through vs Store-and-Forward Switching