Proving The Converse Of The Perpendicular Bisector Theorem: If A Point Is Equidistant From Endpoints Of A Segment, Then It Lies On The Perpendicular Bisector Of The Segment

Converse of the Perpendicular Bisector Theorem

If a point is equidistant from the endpoints of a segment, then it is on the perpendicular bisector of the segment.

The converse of the perpendicular bisector theorem states that if a point is equidistant from the endpoints of a segment, then it lies on the perpendicular bisector of the segment.

In other words, if we have a point P that is equidistant from two points A and B, then we can say that P lies on the perpendicular bisector of segment AB. This means that the line passing through P and perpendicular to AB will cut AB into two equal parts.

To prove the converse of the perpendicular bisector theorem, we need to show that if a point P lies on the perpendicular bisector of segment AB, then it is equidistant from A and B.

Proof:

Given: Point P lies on the perpendicular bisector of segment AB

To Prove: AP = BP

Let’s draw a diagram:

“`
A ———P———B
|
|
|
M
“`

We know that PM is perpendicular to AB (since P lies on the perpendicular bisector of AB). So, we can say that triangles PAM and PBM are right triangles.

Therefore, we have:

“`
AP^2 = PM^2 + AM^2 (by Pythagoras’ theorem)
BP^2 = PM^2 + BM^2 (also by Pythagoras’ theorem)
“`

Since we want to show that AP = BP, we need to use these equations to eliminate PM.

Adding the two equations above, we get:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = PM^2 + AM^2 + PM^2 + BM^2
“`

Simplifying, we have:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = 2PM^2 + AM^2 + BM^2
“`

But we know that PM is the perpendicular bisector of segment AB, so AM = BM (since M is the midpoint of AB). Therefore, we can substitute AM = BM into the equation above:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = 2PM^2 + 2AM^2
“`

But we also know that PM is perpendicular to AB, so we can use the Pythagorean theorem again to substitute 2PM^2 = AB^2:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = AB^2 + 2AM^2
“`

Finally, we can use the fact that M is the midpoint of AB to substitute AB = 2AM:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = (2AM)^2 + 2AM^2
“`

Simplifying, we get:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = 4AM^2 + 2AM^2
“`

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = 6AM^2
“`

But we know that AM is half the length of AB (since M is the midpoint of AB). Therefore:

“`
AM^2 = (AB^2)/4
“`

Substituting this into the equation above, we get:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = (6/4)*AB^2
“`

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = (3/2)*AB^2
“`

But we also know that P lies on the perpendicular bisector of AB, so it cuts AB into two equal parts. Therefore, we have:

“`
AP = BP = AB/2
“`

Substituting this into the equation above, we get:

“`
AP^2 + BP^2 = 2(AP^2)
“`

Simplifying, we get:

“`
AP^2 = BP^2
“`

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

“`
AP = BP
“`

Which is what we wanted to show. Therefore, the converse of the perpendicular bisector theorem is true: if a point is equidistant from the endpoints of a segment, then it lies on the perpendicular bisector of the segment.

More Answers:
How To Find The Circumcenter Of A Triangle: Step-By-Step Guide With Formulas And Examples
The Importance Of And Identifying Points Of Concurrency In Geometry For Practical Applications
The Various Meanings Of Concurrent In Computer Science, Mathematics, Legal Terminology, And Daily Usage.

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

Share:

Recent Posts

Mathematics in Cancer Treatment

How Mathematics is Transforming Cancer Treatment Mathematics plays an increasingly vital role in the fight against cancer mesothelioma. From optimizing drug delivery systems to personalizing

Read More »