Proving the Equivalence of Logical Statements using De Morgan’s Theorem and the Distributive Law in Math

¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q

To prove the equivalence of the given logical statements, we will use the laws of De Morgan’s theorem and the distributive law

To prove the equivalence of the given logical statements, we will use the laws of De Morgan’s theorem and the distributive law. Let’s start with the first statement:

¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q

To prove this, we will work on both sides.

Starting with the left-hand side (LHS):
¬(p ∧ q)

By applying De Morgan’s theorem to the inner part of the expression:
¬p ∨ ¬q

This is the same as the right-hand side (RHS) of the equation.

Therefore, we have proved that ¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q.

Now, let’s move on to the second statement:

¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q

Again, we will work on both sides to prove the equivalence.

Starting with the LHS:
¬(p ∨ q)

By applying De Morgan’s theorem to the inner part of the expression:
¬p ∧ ¬q

This is the same as the RHS of the equation.

Therefore, we have proved that ¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q.

In conclusion, we have proved both logical equivalences:

¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q

¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q

More Answers:

Understanding the Logical Equation p ∧ ¬p ≡ F: A Step by Step Analysis using Basic Laws of Logic
Proving the Equality p ∧ p ≡ pp ∨ p ≡ p with Boolean Algebra Simplification
Proving the Equivalence of ¬(¬p) and p: Understanding the Laws of Negation in Propositional Logic

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

Share:

Recent Posts

Mathematics in Cancer Treatment

How Mathematics is Transforming Cancer Treatment Mathematics plays an increasingly vital role in the fight against cancer mesothelioma. From optimizing drug delivery systems to personalizing

Read More »