Converse of p => q
q => p is the converse of p => qp => q does not follow q => p
The converse of p => q is q => p.
This means that if we know that q is true, we can conclude that p must also be true. However, we cannot conclude that p is true just because q is true.
For example, if p is It is raining and q is The streets are wet, then p => q means that if it is raining, the streets will be wet. The converse, q => p, means that if the streets are wet, it must be raining. However, just because the streets are wet, it does not necessarily mean that it is raining. There could have been a nearby water source that caused the streets to be wet.
In summary, the converse of p => q is q => p, but we cannot assume that p is true just because q is true.
More Answers:
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem: The Limitations of Perfect Voting Systems in Decision-MakingVeto Power in Politics: Its Benefits and Drawbacks
Rational Numbers: Definitions, Examples, And Decimal Representations
Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded