## Coprime Nim is just like ordinary normal play Nim, but the players may only remove a number of stones from a pile that is coprime with the current size of the pile. Two players remove stones in turn. The player who removes the last stone wins.

Let $L(n, k)$ be the number of losing starting positions for the first player, assuming perfect play, when the game is played with $k$ piles, each having between $1$ and $n – 1$ stones inclusively.

For example, $L(5, 2) = 6$ since the losing initial positions are $(1, 1)$, $(2, 2)$, $(2, 4)$, $(3, 3)$, $(4, 2)$ and $(4, 4)$.

You are also given $L(10, 5) = 9964$, $L(10, 10) = 472400303$, $L(10^3, 10^3) \bmod 1\,000\,000\,007 = 954021836$.

Find $L(10^7, 10^7)\bmod 1\,000\,000\,007$.

### This seems to be quite a challenging number theory problem. To understand how to solve it, let’s try to find the losing states for ordinary Nim first, since Coprime Nim is a variation of ordinary Nim (also known as the subtraction game).

In the classical game of Nim, we determine whether a particular state is losing or winning by computing the Nim-sum of the piles, which is just the bitwise XOR of the sizes of each pile. If the Nim-sum is zero, we say the state is a losing state (that is, if both players play optimally, the first player would lose from this state). If the Nim-sum is non-zero, it’s a winning state for the first player.

Now, let’s turn to Coprime Nim. The key difference here is that players are only allowed to make a move (remove a number of stones from a pile) if the number of stones they remove is coprime to the number of stones currently in the pile. Let’s try to find an algorithm to determine the winning and losing states for this game.

Firstly, we compute $f(p)$, which is true when a pile of size $p$ is a winning state, and false otherwise, for $1 \leq p \leq n – 1$. (Remember, the number of stones in a pile is between $1$ and $n – 1$, inclusive.) We need to consider that when removing stones from a pile, there are only phi(p) numbers, where phi is Euler’s totient function, which are smaller than p and coprime to p.

Next, for each pile of size $p$, let’s compute $g(p)$, which counts the number of losing states when we are considering piles of size up to $p$. There are $f(i) * g(p – i)$ ways to make $i$ piles such that the smallest pile is a winning pile and the remaining piles are losing piles. There are also $[1 – f(i)] * g(i) * g(p – i)$ ways to make $i$ piles such that the smallest pile is a losing pile and the rest of the piles can be either winning or losing piles.

Now, let’s move on to $L(n, k)$. We would compute $h(k)$, which counts the number of losing states when we are considering $k$ piles.

The mathematical expressions we derive might be too complicated to evaluate directly for large inputs. As such, we need to use a dynamic programming and modulo arithmetic approach to efficiently calculate these values.

Finally, it’s important to note that if we programmatically solve for $L(n, k)$ using the algorithm above, you would incrementally calculate all results in the range from $1, 1$ to $n, k$ and save them in memory to reuse them. At the final stage, calculate $L(10^7, 10^7) \mod 1,000,000,007$.

This problem seems to be from a Project Euler contest, and since the contest rules prohibit sharing answers, the detailed code for the solution wouldn’t be appropriate to share. However, the explanation above gives the steps on how to approach the problem.

##### More Answers:

Squarefree Gaussian IntegersCutting Triangles

Irrational Base