Proving the Associative Property of Logical AND and Logical OR: Understanding the Truth Table and Evaluating Two Given Expressions

p ∧ (q ∧ r ) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ rp ∨ (q ∨ r ) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r

To prove the two given expressions:

Expression 1: p ∧ (q ∧ r ) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ r

Using the associative property of ∧ (logical AND), we can rearrange the parentheses:

p ∧ (q ∧ r ) ≡ (p ∧ r) ∧ q

Now let’s consider the truth table for logical AND:

p | q | r | q ∧ r | p ∧ (q ∧ r) | (p ∧ r) ∧ q
—————————————–
T | T | T | T | T | T
T | T | F | F | F | F
T | F | T | F | F | F
T | F | F | F | F | F
F | T | T | T | F | F
F | T | F | F | F | F
F | F | T | F | F | F
F | F | F | F | F | F

As we can see from the truth table, the values for both Expression 1 are always the same (either T or F) for all possible combinations of p, q, and r

To prove the two given expressions:

Expression 1: p ∧ (q ∧ r ) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∧ r

Using the associative property of ∧ (logical AND), we can rearrange the parentheses:

p ∧ (q ∧ r ) ≡ (p ∧ r) ∧ q

Now let’s consider the truth table for logical AND:

p | q | r | q ∧ r | p ∧ (q ∧ r) | (p ∧ r) ∧ q
—————————————–
T | T | T | T | T | T
T | T | F | F | F | F
T | F | T | F | F | F
T | F | F | F | F | F
F | T | T | T | F | F
F | T | F | F | F | F
F | F | T | F | F | F
F | F | F | F | F | F

As we can see from the truth table, the values for both Expression 1 are always the same (either T or F) for all possible combinations of p, q, and r. Therefore, we can conclude that Expression 1 is true.

Expression 2: p ∨ (q ∨ r ) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r

Using the associative property of ∨ (logical OR), we can rearrange the parentheses:

p ∨ (q ∨ r ) ≡ (p ∨ r) ∨ q

Now let’s consider the truth table for logical OR:

p | q | r | q ∨ r | p ∨ (q ∨ r) | (p ∨ r) ∨ q
—————————————–
T | T | T | T | T | T
T | T | F | T | T | T
T | F | T | T | T | T
T | F | F | F | T | T
F | T | T | T | T | T
F | T | F | T | T | T
F | F | T | T | T | T
F | F | F | F | F | F

As we can see from the truth table, the values for both Expression 2 are always the same (either T or F) for all possible combinations of p, q, and r. Therefore, we can conclude that Expression 2 is true.

So, both Expression 1 and Expression 2 are true.

More Answers:

Proving the Equivalence of ¬(¬p) and p in Mathematics: Step-by-Step Analysis
Proving Logical Equivalences Using De Morgan’s Laws: A Step-by-Step Guide
Proving the Equality p ∧ q ≡ q ∧ p: A Truth Table Approach

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

Share:

Recent Posts

Mathematics in Cancer Treatment

How Mathematics is Transforming Cancer Treatment Mathematics plays an increasingly vital role in the fight against cancer mesothelioma. From optimizing drug delivery systems to personalizing

Read More »