¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q
To prove the two logical equivalences:
1
To prove the two logical equivalences:
1. ¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q
2. ¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q
We will use the laws of De Morgan’s and the distributive properties of logical connectives.
1. ¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q
To prove this equivalence, we will work on each side separately and compare them.
Left-hand side (LHS):
¬(p ∧ q)
Applying De Morgan’s law for conjunction (AND), we have:
¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q
Therefore, the left-hand side matches the right-hand side, and the equivalence is proven.
2. ¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q
To prove this equivalence, we will again work on each side separately and compare them.
Left-hand side (LHS):
¬(p ∨ q)
Applying De Morgan’s law for disjunction (OR), we have:
¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q
Therefore, the left-hand side matches the right-hand side, and the equivalence is proven.
In both cases, the logical equivalences are proven using De Morgan’s laws.
More Answers:
The Logical Equivalence Between p ∧ ¬p and Fp ∨ ¬p: A Step-by-Step BreakdownProving logical equivalence: p ∧ p ≡ pp ∨ p ≡ p
Proving the Equivalence of ¬(¬p) and p in Mathematics: Step-by-Step Analysis