Understanding the Complexity of Moral Judgment and the Continuing Development of Moral Reasoning

The capacity for moral judgment is rigid, because a person’s cognitive moral development and his or her ability to employ what he or she understands peaks at a certain age.

NEITHER the statement NOR the reason is correct.

This statement is partially true, but not entirely accurate. It is true that moral judgment is influenced by cognitive moral development, which refers to the process through which individuals acquire and develop their moral reasoning abilities. This development is typically thought to peak in early adulthood, around age 25, and then plateau or decline slightly as a person ages.

However, it is incorrect to say that the capacity for moral judgment is rigid. People may continue to develop their moral reasoning abilities even after they reach peak cognitive development. Additionally, while cognitive development is an important factor in moral judgment, it is not the only factor. Emotions, social context, and personal experiences also play important roles in shaping moral judgments.

Furthermore, the idea that moral judgment is rigid implies that people cannot change their moral beliefs or behavior. However, research has shown that individuals can and do change their moral views throughout their lives in response to new experiences and information. This suggests that the capacity for moral judgment is not rigid, but rather can continue to evolve and develop throughout a person’s life.

More Answers: