Proving Linear Dependency: The Relationship Between Z And Span{X, Y}.

HW 4: If {x, y} is linearly independent, and if z is in Span{x, y}, then {x, y, z} is linearly dependent.

TRUE. Since z is in Span{x, y}, then z is a linear combination of x, y, thus {x, y, z} is linearly dependent.

We can prove that {x, y, z} is linearly dependent if z is in Span{x, y} using the following steps:

1. Since z is in Span{x, y}, we can write z as a linear combination of x and y. Let’s say that z = a\*x + b\*y for some scalars a and b.

2. We want to show that there exist scalars c and d, not both zero, such that c\*x + d\*y + e\*z = 0 for some nonzero scalar e. This would show that {x, y, z} is linearly dependent.

3. We can substitute z = a\*x + b\*y into the equation from step 2 to get c\*x + d\*y + e\*(a\*x + b\*y) = 0.

4. We can simplify this equation to get (c + e\*a)\*x + (d + e\*b)\*y = 0.

5. Since {x, y} is linearly independent, we know that c + e\*a = 0 and d + e\*b = 0. This is because if c + e\*a were nonzero, then we could solve for e and get a linear combination of x and y that equals zero, contradicting the linear independence of {x, y}.

6. Solving for e in each equation gives us e = -c/a and e = -d/b.

7. Since e must be the same in both equations, we can set -c/a = -d/b and solve for d to get d = -(b/a)\*c.

8. Therefore, we have c\*x + d\*y + e\*z = c\*x – (b/a)\*c\*y + (-c/a)(a\*x + b\*y).

9. Simplifying this equation gives us (ac – bc + ac)/a\*x + (-bc – ab + bc)/b\*y = 0.

10. We can factor out c from this equation to get (2ac – ab – bc)/(ab)\*(c\*x + d\*y) = 0.

11. Since c and d are not both zero (if they were, then {x, y, z} would be trivially linearly dependent), we must have 2ac – ab – bc = 0.

12. We can simplify this equation to get a = (b/c) and substitute this into the equation for z from step 1 to get z = (b/c)\*x + b\*y. This shows that z is a linear combination of x and y, so {x, y, z} is linearly dependent.

Therefore, we have shown that if {x, y} is linearly independent and z is in Span{x, y}, then {x, y, z} is linearly dependent.

More Answers:
Matrix Multiplication: Debunking The False Claim That Ab = [A1B1 A2B2] For 2 X 2 Matrices A And B.
How To Prove That If Ab = Ac And A Is An Invertible Square Matrix, B = C
Proving The Statement: If A System Has Infinitely Many Solutions, The Matrix Isn’T Invertible.

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

Share:

Recent Posts

Mathematics in Cancer Treatment

How Mathematics is Transforming Cancer Treatment Mathematics plays an increasingly vital role in the fight against cancer mesothelioma. From optimizing drug delivery systems to personalizing

Read More »