Maximum Product of Parts

Let $N$ be a positive integer and let $N$ be split into $k$ equal parts, $r = N/k$, so that $N = r + r + \cdots + r$.
Let $P$ be the product of these parts, $P = r \times r \times \cdots \times r = r^k$.
For example, if $11$ is split into five equal parts, $11 = 2.2 + 2.2 + 2.2 + 2.2 + 2.2$, then $P = 2.2^5 = 51.53632$.
Let $M(N) = P_{\mathrm{max}}$ for a given value of $N$.
It turns out that the maximum for $N = 11$ is found by splitting eleven into four equal parts which leads to $P_{\mathrm{max}} = (11/4)^4$; that is, $M(11) = 14641/256 = 57.19140625$, which is a terminating decimal.
However, for $N = 8$ the maximum is achieved by splitting it into three equal parts, so $M(8) = 512/27$, which is a non-terminating decimal.
Let $D(N) = N$ if $M(N)$ is a non-terminating decimal and $D(N) = -N$ if $M(N)$ is a terminating decimal.
For example, $\sum D(N)$ for $5 \le N \le 100$ is $2438$.
Find $\sum D(N)$ for $5 \le N \le 10000$.

Please note: This is a high-level combinatorics and calculus problem, typically found in competitive mathematics or higher-level coursework. Here’s a detailed solution.

The solution to this problem is largely based on the AM-GM Inequality (Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean Inequality), which for $k$ numbers $x_1, x_2, x_3, \dots, x_k$ says that

$\frac{x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + \dots + x_k}{k} \geq \sqrt[k]{x_1x_2x_3 \dots x_k}$

Equality holds if and only if $x_1 = x_2 = x_3 = \dots = x_k$. This inequality tells us that for fixed sum (in this case, N), the product is maximized when the terms are equal. So, we need to split N into equal parts to get the maximum product.

However, we have some flexibility in the number of equal parts (k), and selecting the right k is key to solving this problem.

Observe that $r^k$ is maximized where its derivative is zero, i.e., when $\frac{d(r^k)}{dr}=0$. The derivative is $kr^{k-1} – Nk^{k-2}$, and setting that equal to 0 and solving gives $r=\frac{k}{k-1}$. The integer part of $r$ is thus $\left\lfloor\frac{k}{k-1}\right\rfloor$.

So, if $\left\lfloor\frac{k}{k-1}\right\rfloor \leq N < \left\lfloor\frac{k+1}{k}\right\rfloor$, $r^k$ is maximized when k parts are equal (when possible) and one part is 1 unit larger. Also, note that if k is a power of 2, $r=N/k$ is a power of 2, meaning $P$ is a non-terminating decimal when divided by $k^k$. For all other k, $P$ is a terminating decimal. To implement this, we can loop over all values of N (5 to 10000) and for each N, determine the best k by checking the inequalities sequentially starting from k=2, until we find $N < \left\lfloor\frac{k+1}{k}\right\rfloor$. Then, if k is a power of 2, N is added; otherwise, N is subtracted. Sum up all these contributions and that's your answer. To code this efficiently in a language like Python for example, it would be useful to preprocess a lookup table to quickly find whether a number is a power of 2 (true only for 1,2,4,8, etc.), like so: ``` powerOf2 = [False]*(10000+1) power = 1 while(power <= 10000): powerOf2[power] = True power*=2 ``` You can then run your sum-loop calculation using this lookup table. This solution runs efficiently as both loops are O(1), fast enough for N up to 10000 or beyond.

More Answers:
Golden Triplets
Grouping Two Different Coloured Objects
RSA Encryption

Error 403 The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your quota. : quotaExceeded

Share:

Recent Posts

Mathematics in Cancer Treatment

How Mathematics is Transforming Cancer Treatment Mathematics plays an increasingly vital role in the fight against cancer mesothelioma. From optimizing drug delivery systems to personalizing

Read More »